AT&T Fellows Final Reports April 2006 |
| Name |
Michael Morrone |
| Title |
Lecturer |
| Department |
Business Communication |
| Campus |
Bloomington |
| Project Title |
Creating Diversity in the Classroom through Use of Indiana University’s Online Collaboration Tools |
| Project Goal |
To create diversity in student teams that are learning about teamwork |
| Type of Technology Used in the Project |
Oncourse CL course sites, project sites, and Adobe Connect (f/k/a Macromedia Adobe Connect Meeting) |
Executive Summary of Results
The combined efforts of the IU School of Medicine and the School of Informatics, New Media program at IUPUI bring video game technology together with medical pedagogy. This has resulted in an immersive simulation/video game that allows the use of medical data and techniques yet promotes the importance of split second decision-making and sound bedside manner through the virtual experience. The XML database allows for assessment for student competency and progress that can be quickly made available to both student and instructor. The SBC grant created the alpha stage, which serves as a framework for these goals and has a database to support a limited simulation scenario.
Need for the Project
Briefly explain why you believed there was a need for your project and what teaching approach was used to address this need.Both KSB and SSU believe in preparing future leaders (SSU Mission Statement and KSB Mission). As leaders they will need communication skills to work successfully in the increasing diversity that is part of the American landscape. While the number of corporations that promote diversity has dramatically risen, businesses in general have “emphasized diversity without a sufficient grasp of how individuals work as a team” (Mannix and Neal, 2006). And recent studies suggest that surface level diversity (such as racial diversity), if mismanaged, effects workplace performance negatively (Kwak, 2003). People need “a more nuanced” understanding of diversity for it to be helpful (Kwak, 2003). Teams with high surface level diversity must overcome “disruptive effects of their differences… to engage in effective and creative problem solving” (Mannix and Neal, 2006).
The typical age of college students puts colleges and universities in a crucial role of preparing students to maximize the benefits of diversity while minimizing the disruptions it can cause in the workplace and in our society generally. In one recent study, the authors concluded that “in order to foster citizenship for a diverse democracy, educators must intentionally structure opportunities for students to leave the comfort of their homogeneous peer group and build relationships across racially/ethnically diverse student communities on campus” (Gurin, Dey, Hurtado, and Gurin, 2002).
Need for project at IU and KSB
In 2002, only 3.1% of IU Bloomington’s students were Black or African-American (http://www.iub.edu/~asd/diversity/facts.html, downloaded 1/4/2006) and as of Spring 2003, just above 2% of KSB students were Black of African-American (http://www.kelley.iu.edu/ugrad/diversity/3yrReportUpdate.pdf, downloaded on 1/6/2006). The national percentage of Black or African-Americans was 12.3% and Indiana’s was 8.4% according to the 2000 census. (American fact finder, US Census Bureau website, downloaded 1/6/2006). IU sections involved included no African American or black students and 1 Asian international student out of 54 students
Need for project at SSU
Savannah State University’s mission statement discusses the racial makeup its campus: “The University serves a primarily African-American student population enriched by a diversity of traditional and non--traditional students from other countries, cultures, and races” (SSU Mission Statement, 2/15/2006). The SSU section involved included no Caucasians or Asians out of 44 students.
Both IU and SSU strongly supported this project with its hopes to augment classroom diversity through the use of technology.
Teaching approach
This team project was designed to foster cross racial communication and teamwork in classrooms that were racially homogenous.
Use of Technology
Briefly explain how your project used instructional technology in a new or different way.Oncourse CL
Oncourse CL provided an excellent environment for team work. Savannah State students received IU guest accounts and were listed as participants in the IU Oncourse CL sections involved in the project. Each student team also had its own project site in Oncourse CL for private collaboration. Each team had access to the following tools:
The course site (as opposed to the team project site) also facilitated knowledge of each other and each campus by using the web content tool to create links to facebook (facebook.com), each campus’s news pages, rockpaperscissors.biz, and other links as requested by the students.
Use of Adobe Connect Live
Adobe Connect was set up to be a virtual meeting room that team members enter to chat, to see and hear each other while meeting, and to share files and screens. Students used webcams to meet and collaborate in their teams. Several teams heavily relied on the chat and document sharing functions in Adobe Connect.
At the project’s culmination, the student teams presented their work products to the faculty and the president of RPS. Adobe Connect Live was used during the final presentations to allow all team members to be visible and heard while and to create virtually seamless presentation of the teams’ PowerPoint slides and other visual aids.
Instructional Design Plan
Describe how the use of technology used supported your teaching approach:
The students worked in racially-diverse teams to research expansion of RPS. The research resulted in a written report and a team presentation. In sum, the communication skills emphasized in this project were:
Moreover, it is believed that the project fostered more learning about communication than a homogenous classroom by pushing students to apply communication concepts in a new thought-provoking way. This project also held promise for preparing students for the democratic realities of the working world including: the need to consider and analyze issues from multiple perspectives; the need to communicate with supervisors and subordinates regardless of their racial background; and, the need to respond appropriately to an audience regardless of racial background (Gurin, et. al., 2002).
respective learning styles, and build collaboration?
The teaching plan incorporated a real world work assignment into the normal X204 curriculum. The specific activities included two individually-completed progress memos, a team report, and a team presentation. Feedback was provided in three ways: (1) general feedback was provided using the announcement tool in Oncourse CL and (2) during in class discussion, and (3) individual feedback was provided according to rubrics designed to reinforce key concepts emphasized in X204.
The assignment was specifically designed to require collaboration, as it resulted in a team report and team presentation. The team presentation required collaborative design of a Powerpoint presentation. The presentation was “broadcast” via Adobe Connect at SSU and IU. The instructors at both IU and SSU, as well as, the president of RPS attended these meetings. Students from IU and SSU fielded questions from the president of RPS.
From a practical and from a teaching and learning perspective, this project was only possible, because the technology made it feasible for IU and SSU students to collaborate in racially-diverse teams.
KSB support services and the Teaching and Learning Technology Center facilitated completion of this project from its inception to its completion.
The project is easily understood. However, it is not easy to execute necessarily.
The project involved tools that were new to the SSU students, and the initial learning curve became a bottleneck to getting the project up and running. Once the project was up and running, the process of working in virtual teams itself was extremely challenging for the students. Also, the distance separating IU and SSU increased student frustration about working in teams. Based on data collected during this project, one reason that the students felt this frustration was that the students did not gravitate to use of the asynchronous tools that CL includes. Instead, they wanted real time collaboration, and online meeting times were difficult to schedule especially early on when the SSU students were first learning about the IU online learning environment. However, by the end of the project, several student teams relied heavily on Adobe Connect for real time meetings. In short, if this project were executed by other faculty, they need to prepare to spend significantly more time outside the classroom facilitating team work than they would spend when the student teams are created within the same section of an IU class. I believe that many of the problems faced early on could be avoided if all students and faculty involved in the project could be brought together at the beginning of the project.
Also, any faculty member who attempts a similar project must be ready to learn about the technology. He or she must not become easily flustered or frustrated by the myriad ways the students will attempt and will not attempt to use the technology. The students will have lots of questions about the technology and how they should use it. They will gravitate to tools they feel most comfortable with, even if those aren’t the tools that the faculty emphasize. I had one group eschew the whole IU online environment, because the lead SSU team member wanted to communicate through Facebook. (In that particular team, the IU students became familiar with Adobe Connect so that the final presentation ran smoothly.)
The faculty member at the partnering institution must also be adept with technology, or the institution must be ready to support the faculty member.
Potential to Impact Student Learning
Clearly define how your project improved student learning - include specific examples of how your project:
Anecdotally and after initial review of student reflections collected at the beginning and end of the project, it appears that the students in the teams with surface level diversity moved more towards a “nuanced” understanding of team work than the students in the teams comprised of all IU students.
In most instances students in the diverse teams, based on the pre-project reflection, began the semester with rosy expectations about how diversity would impact team work, albeit with some concern about lack of proximity to the SSU teammates. This perception and understanding mirrors that of employers who embrace diversity without understanding how to take advantage of it (Mannix and Neal, 2006). Sample comments from different randomly-selected post-project reflections demonstrate the students’ development beyond this rosy outlook:
Assessment Plan
Briefly explain the effectiveness of your assessment plan:
I received IRB approval to study the RPS project, as part of my work on the AT&T grant. The data is comprised of student work, including a pre and post project reflection on team work and diversity and a report on the use of technology. Of my three sections, one was a control group; the teams in that section were comprised of IU students only. All data was collected in the fall 2006 semester. I am in the process of analyzing the data.
In the fall 2006 semester, I evaluated the students’ team presentations in their second major project of the semester, the Target project, according to a rubric designed specifically to assess team presentations. Overall, the students showed improvement in their team work skills by the time they completed their Target presentation near the end of the term. The students across all sections showed greater mastery of team work skills than students from the prior semester. However, the students who were teamed with the SSU students demonstrated greater mastery of team work skills as applied to team presentations than did the control group. A visiting professor who teaches an upper level course commented on the high quality of the presentations. I should note that in all respects, except for the RPS project, the class was designed similarly to the spring 06 semester.
Plan for Colleague Development
Describe your role and activities as a mentor:
I am part of my department’s technology committee. I presented the “virtual teamwork” tools to my department; many of my colleagues are interested in expanding the scope of this project.
Dan Smith, Dean of Kelley School of Business, had me explain the project to the faculty at a faculty meeting. One key focus of this presentation was that the technology makes this type of project feasible in other classes.
I presented the conceptual design of the project at the POD Network Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon, October 28, 2006
I do believe that IU’s online environment can be used in other contexts or disciplines to complete a similar project. I actually believe that the approach’s applicability is limited by only a teacher’s creativity and will to come up with projects that fit his or her course objectives. Creativity is necessary for innovating new types of assignments that will foster the collaboration that makes this project vital. Also, determination is required to find a partnering institution and the right faculty member at a partnering institution who will help assure the success of the project.
Final Comments on Project Results
The student teams successfully collaborated and presented their findings to the president of RockPaperScissors, Inc. He was pleased with the reports and presentations overall. I felt that the initial learning curve regarding the technology slowed down and in fact limited the collaboration between the IU and SSU students. In other words, more team chemistry could have been generated and, therefore, even more learning about team work in racially-diverse teams.
I recommend the following to others who try this type of project. Ideally, the students from the partnering school would visit IU at the project’s kick off. The students would form their teams at that time in a way that would be more personal than an online meeting. The students from the partnering school would also go through some IT training regarding the IU online environment. I believe that hybridizing the project in this minimal way would have substantial payoff for the collaboration.
I also feel I must mention one major non-technology related obstacle that I confronted in this project. Less than one month before the project was to be implemented in the classroom, the faculty member at SSU with whom I was working on this project left SSU to become a dean at another historically black university. This last minute development definitely affected the implementation of this project as this faculty member was highly dedicated to the success of our collaboration. Regardless, I want to mention that her replacement an adjunct instructor, Robert Carson, did an admirable job of getting up to speed and facilitating this project given the circumstances.
Finally, I feel thankful that I had the opportunity to carry out the collaboration with SSU. I believe that the availability of tools such as Adobe Connect and Oncourse CL add significant opportunity to enhance teaching and learning at IU. I strongly encourage others to attempt this type of project.
References
20/20 Report. (n.d.). Retrieved January 5, 2006, from http://www.indiana.edu/~asd/diversity/2020.html
20/20 Update. (2003). Retrieved January 6, 2006, from http://www.kelley.iu.edu/ugrad/diversity/3yrReportUpdate.pdf
American Factfinder. (n.d.) Retrieved January 6, 2006, from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=01000US&-qr_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_QTP5&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&-_lang=en&-_sse=on
Gurin, Patricia, Dey, Eric L., Hurtado, Sylvia, and Gurin, Gerald. (2002) “Diversity and Higher Education: Theory and Impact on Educational Outcomes,” Harvard Educational Review, 72.
Kelley School of Business. (n.d.) Our Mission. Retrieved 10/28/2006 from Kelley School of Business website: (http://www.kelley.iu.edu/KSB_Global/Information/OurMission/page3841.html)
Kwak, Mary. (2003). “The Paradoxical Affect of Diversity,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, 7.
Mannix, Elizabeth, and Neale, Margaret A.. (2006) “Diversity at Work: Diversity in Employee Teams Does not Always Equal Superior Performance,” Scientific American Mind, 17, 32-39.
Mission & Vision of Savannah State University. (n.d.). Retrieved 10/26/2006 from Savannah State University website: http://www.savstate.edu/mission.htm
Last updated:
18 May, 2007
Comments and
Questions | (317) 278-4833
Copyright © 1999-2003,
The Trustees of Indiana University